Archive for the ‘Special Interests’ Category

Is Bill Ketron Just a Pawn for Lt. Gov. Ron Ramsey?

Monday, February 1st, 2010

pinkyringx300NASHVILLE - Tennessee Democratic Party Chairman Chip Forrester said the legislative record of state Sen. Bill Ketron indicates that the Murfreesboro lawmaker is simply a “yes” man for fellow Republican senator and gubernatorial candidate Ron Ramsey, the state’s lieutenant governor.

“The district’s voters deserve an elected official who is looking after their interests, not someone who is more worried about political posturing and feathering his own nest,” Forrester said. “Mr. Ketron has demonstrated time and again that his priorities align more with the powers that be than with the hard-working families in Middle Tennessee.

“At a time when families are struggling to make ends meet and the state’s budget is being trimmed to the bone, you have a legislator introducing bills that bleed the working man, delay fair and accurate elections, and shut the door to a more open government. Mr. Ketron is out of touch with ordinary people.”

For example, Ketron introduced poorly written workers compensation legislation that passed into law in 2008 but was delayed at the beginning of this year’s legislative session after concerns arose; a bill that delayed implementation of a law requiring the purchase of new voting equipment across the state; and a bill that would make some public records off limits to the general public.

“We need lawmakers in the General Assembly who understand the challenges we face and work tirelessly to make Tennessee a better place to live and raise a family,” Forrester said.

“Policies that create jobs for our communities, ensure our children are well educated and make our lives more comfortable should be at the top of the priority list, not how to take care of a special interest group contributing to your campaign or a colleague with ulterior motives.”

Ketron has even admitted he doesn’t always have time to thoroughly read and understand legislation he votes for or against. He represents Lincoln, Marshall, Maury and part of Rutherford counties in the Senate.

“The thing was on a fast track,” Ketron reportedly told the Murfreesboro Daily News Journal when explaining his vote to reform education through the state’s application for federal stimulus money. “We barely had time to read through it.”

Forrester called Ketron’s explanation for not reading legislation thoroughly before casting a vote a “lame excuse and a blatant disregard for your duty as a legislator.”

“It appears to me that Mr. Ketron is Ron Ramsey’s ‘yes’ man,” he added.

Democrats Seek Delay In New Workers’ Compensation Mandate

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010

Rep. Joe Pitts (D-Clarksville)

Rep. Joe Pitts (D-Clarksville)

NASHVILLE - Citing the slumping economy’s devastating effects on small-business owners, Democratic lawmakers Joe Pitts and Tim Barnes are seeking to delay until 2011 a state law that forces all building contractors to carry workers’ compensation insurance.

The law in question, sponsored by Republican House Leader Jason Mumpower of Bristol and Republican state Sen. Bill Ketron of Murfreesboro, went into effect on Dec. 31. Some building and small-business groups have said the new workers’ compensation policies are too costly for their members, especially at a time when the construction industry is in a downturn.

“Mr. Ketron and Mr. Mumpower are more worried about helping their big business buddies than on helping the self-employed guy out here trying to make ends meet,” Tennessee Democratic Party Chairman Chip Forrester said. “The workers’ compensation bill they shepherded through the legislature may put some small-business owners in a real financial bind or even out of business.”

Sen. Tim Barnes (D-Clarksville)

Sen. Tim Barnes (D-Clarksville)

“We need lawmakers in the General Assembly who understand the challenges we face and work tirelessly to make Tennessee a better place to live and raise a family. Policies that create jobs for our communities, ensure our children are well educated and make our lives more comfortable should be at the top of the priority list, not how to take care of a special interest group contributing to your campaign.”

State Rep. Pitts and state Sen. Barnes have introduced a bill delaying the new workers’ compensation law, which forces general contractors to carry the insurance on subcontractors and other workers who were not otherwise covered. As written, the new law also applies to sole proprietors and partnerships with six or fewer employees.

“They can’t pay when they are an industry that has been devastated by this recession and their income has shrunk dramatically,” said Jim Brown, Tennessee director of the National Federation of Independent Businesses, during a recent television interview with WSMV-TV in Nashville.

Efforts by Pitts and Barnes to delay implementation of the law were scuttled last year. The General Assembly, however, will convene tomorrow, Tuesday, Jan. 12, a special session dealing with education reforms and the workers’ compensation issue.

Many lawmakers agree the law is flawed and hope it can be delayed until all concerns can be addressed.

“I hope this next session will focus on real concerns for the state and not be a venue to score cheap political points for the November elections,” Forrester said. “We have too much riding on the future of this state to waste time on grandstanding and nonsense.”

Bill Ketron Robs Small Contractors Of Their Hard-Earned Profits

Friday, January 8th, 2010

billketronRepublican Senator Bill Ketron of Murfreesboro is an insurance salesman. He has taken in over $20,000 in campaign cash from big insurance and large homebuilding special interests. So it shouldn’t surprise anyone that he sponsored a new state law to force small contractors and subconstractors to spend their hard-earned profits with him and his insurance buddies instead of spending it on their families in tough economic times.

Public Chapter 1041, sponsored by Senator Bill Ketron (R-Murfreesboro) and Rep. Jason Mumpower (R-Bristol) was lobbied for heavily by the Tennessee Hombuilders Association (a special interest group that represents large development companies) and the Tennessee Insurors Association, who greased the wheels of government with copious amounts of campaign cash for Republican lawmakers in order to further the interests of big business over the little guy. It would require all contractors to purchase workers’ compensation insurance even if their only employee is themselves. The new law took effect January 1st, and small contractors are howling mad about it:

Gerry Fridlund, owner of Skybright Metal Roofing in Memphis, found out about the law the hard way when his insurance company sent him a bill for $4,300 last summer.

“I told them I wasn’t going to pay it,” Fridlund told NIT. “When I asked who was responsible for this I was told the Home Builders Association pushed this through. I think they wanted to stop the little guy from bidding up against the big boys. They want to squeeze the sole proprietors and make it difficult for people to start small businesses.”

The new law’s Senate sponsor, Sen. Bill Ketron (R-Murfreesboro), is himself an insurance salesman who benefits from raising premiums on small contractor businesses. During his current term, special interest PACs representing large home builders, developers and insurance industries gave more than $20,000 to Ketron’s campaign war chest.

The new law’s House sponsor, Rep. Jason Mumpower (R-Bristol), has received $18,000 from special interest PACs representing large home builders, developers and insurance industries during his current term.

Its all fine with Bill Ketron, who will be sending out grossly inflated insurance bills to his customers this year. He doesn’t really care that jobs may be killed to pay for it as long as he gets paid.

Thankfully, Rep. Joe Pitts (D - Clarksville) and Sen. Tim Barnes (D-Clarksville) have listened to the voices of Tennessee’s small business owners and are seeking to delay the enforcement of the new law in Special Session of the General Assembly next week. HB1899 and its companion bill SB2055 delay Ketron’s law until July 1st of 2010. As usual, its up to Democrats to finally stand up for small business owners when republicans and their big business cronies try to sneak in sweetheart deals for themselves.

Taxpayers Foot Bill For Republican Speaker’s SUV

Monday, December 21st, 2009

dennishastertFormer Republican Speaker of the House turned lobbyist Dennis Hastert drives an SUV and has a nice office where he and his staff gab on cell phones all day. Its all paid for with your money though:

U.S. taxpayers are spending more than $40,000 per month on office space, staff, cell phones and a leased SUV for former House Speaker Dennis Hastert, even as he works as a lobbyist for private corporations and foreign governments.

“It is specifically prohibited — federal dollars can’t be spent on lobbying operations,” Ellis said. “We are paying for his staff [and] for a car, and we need to be very sure that he isn’t spending a dime of that money on lobbying operations. “That all needs to be above board, in the clear and transparent. And it’s not.”

Tax & Spend Republicans strike again.

Rutherford County Republicans vote to pollute Tennessee waterways

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

A Republican sponsored bill (HB 1204 / SB 1331) that would have allowed the coal industry to pollute Tennessee’s waterways narrowly failed in the state House today 49 - 42. The bill’s House sponsor says he is not sure if he’ll try to refile the bill.

Rep. Joe McCord (R-8) admitted today on the House floor that the bill was written and given to him to sponsor by the coal industry. The bill would have allowed selenium levels from coal production to reach unacceptable levels (7.5 ppm) in Tennessee lakes, rivers and streams. Watch this video to see what selenium waste has done to aquatic life.

Rep. McCord and several of his Republican colleagues repeatedly claimed the bill would bring Tennessee up to the latest EPA standards for selenium levels in U.S. waterways. The EPA, however, never adopted the proposal which Republicans falsely claimed were the latest standards.

Furthermore, the scientist who helped draft the 2004 proposal for the EPA on selenium levels has since reported that his findings were wrong and that the bill as written would in fact kill nearly 80% of fish in Tennessee waterways, one reason the proposal was rejected by the Bush Administration’s EPA in the first place.

Despite these facts, Tennessee Republicans persisted on behalf of the coal industry, including those representing Rutherford County.

The audacity of Tennessee Republicans to pass off junk science and misrepresent the truth in the state legislature as the basis of their support for poisoning Tennessee waterways is embarrassing and immoral.

Tennesseans are called upon to be good stewards of God’s creation and to protect it for generations to come. Tennessee Republicans demonstrated today yet again whose side they are on when it comes to that calling. Tennessee Republicans sided with the interests of the coal industry over protecting our environment and our great state’s cultural heritage of hunting and fishing.

Here is how our state’s delegation voted on the selenium bill:

Tennessee conservative explains justification for doctor’s assassination

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

Family Action Council of Tennessee President David Fowler penned an article yesterday condemning the assassination of Dr. George Tiller but then explained how murdering doctors is justified in the minds of the politically deranged.

Over time, those who grew up with abortion legal and common no longer had a moral sense that it was wrong. And if not wrong, then why would any particular type of abortion, like partial-birth abortion, be wrong? On the other hand, when the law allows something as horrific as partial-birth abortion, some perhaps begin to lose their respect for the law and, taking that disrespect to its final conclusion, it becomes justification for breaking the law, taking the law into one’s own hands–vigilante justice against persons like Dr. Tiller.

Rep. Kent Coleman (D-49) stands with voters over liquor lobbyists

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

House Republicans failed to defeat Rep. Kent Coleman’s (D-49) amendment to a booze bill in the House yesterday.

Rep. Coleman’s amendment allows voters to decide if they want liquor stills built in their communities. A Republican led attempt to defeat this amendment failed Wednesday just as it did the week before.

As written, Rep. Joe Carr’s (R-48) booze bill would have forced any county whose voters approved liquor stores to also allow liquor stills whether they want them or not. Rep. Coleman’s amendment takes that decision away from lawmakers in the back pocket of liquor lobbyists and puts it back in the hands of the voters.

Rep. Carr attempted to kill Rep. Coleman’s amendment on May 14 on behalf of liquor lobbyists but failed to get support from House members. Republicans returned Wednesday with a second attempt to kill Rep. Coleman’s amendment by forcing counties to accept liquor stills whether they want them or not. The Republican effort was withdrawn yesterday after a considerable outcry from House members who wanted their voters to make these decisions for themselves.  Several of Rep. Carr’s own Republican colleagues had filed amendments to exclude their counties from his booze bill.

Sen. Bill Ketron (R-13), the Senate bill’s author, stated on WPLN today that he would support the bill and its amendments, but we’ll see about that once the bill goes to committee. If the amendment is stripped by liquor lobbyists, voters could bring lawsuits against the state for retroactively changing what their votes on liquor store referendums meant for their communities.

Another amendment Republicans might try to strip from the bill in committee is an amendment by Rep. Curt Cobb (D-62) that would protect churches. Rep. Cobb’s amendment requires liquor stills to abide by liquor store zoning rules that prevent them from selling liquor next to churches. The amendment is opposed by liquor lobbyists who want the right to sell liquor anywhere they want.

Also read:

Liquor lobbyists angered over booze bill amendment that protects churches

Friday, May 15th, 2009

Liquor lobbyists who support Rep. Joe Carr’s (R-48) booze bill were angered yesterday by a proposed amendment that would protect churches.

Rep. Curt Cobb (D-62) filed an amendment yesterday to force distilleries who sell liquor to abide by local ordinances that define how close to churches liquor can be sold. Local zoning laws approved by voters across the state prevent liquor and porn stores from locating near churches. As written, Rep. Carr’s booze bill would allow licensed liquor stills to locate wherever county manufacturing zoning allows.

Several conservative Republican representatives, including Rep. Maggart (R-45) and Rep. Lynn (R-57), filed amendments to exclude their counties from Rep. Carr’s booze bill because the bill doesn’t protect churches or the will of voters. Carr’s conservative colleagues felt they were protecting the values of their communities from a poorly written bill.

Rep. Kent Coleman (D-49) successfully added an amendment to the booze bill that gives voters the right to decide if they want liquor stills in their county. Rep. Carr fought the amendment unsuccessfully hoping to force counties to accept liquor stills whether they wanted them or not. Rep. Donna Rowland (R-34) also voted against the amendment.

The bill goes to the House floor for a vote next Wednesday.

Rep. Joe Carr’s (R-48) booze bill brings ‘pandemonium’ to House floor

Thursday, May 14th, 2009

carrmumpower1

Rep. Joe Carr’s (R-48) booze bill ran into more problems hours ago in the Tennessee legislature. Rep. Carr had to delay his bill until next Wednesday after several amendments to protect voters caused what one of his colleagues described on the House floor as “pandemonium.”

Rep. Carr’s booze bill as written denies voters the right to decide if they want liquor distilleries in their county. The bill would retroactively make a vote for liquor stores a vote to also allow the liquor industry to manufacture “intoxicating liquors” in the county without the explicit approval of voters.

Rep. Kent Coleman (D-49) amended Rep. Carr’s booze bill granting the right for voters to make these decisions themselves through a local referendum. Rep. Carr tried and failed to kill Rep. Coleman’s amendment. It was the only amendment Rep. Carr targeted.

Several of Rep. Carr’s own Republican colleagues, including Rep. Maggart (R-45), Rep. Lynn (R-57) and Rep. Floyd (R-27), filed amendments to exclude their counties from the consequences of Rep. Carr’s sloppy booze bill. Rep. Curt Cobb (D-62) filed an amendment that would prevent distilleries from selling their liquor near churches, a move that angered the liquor lobbyists who support the bill.

This was the third time Rep. Carr delayed his bill due to confusion in the House. Rep. Curry Todd (R-95) complained to the House Speaker that the bill was taking up too much valuable time on an already crowded legislative calendar. Rep. Carr spent nearly 45 minutes of the House’s time today defending his booze bill. Rep. Jason Mumpower (R-3) stood by Rep. Carr’s side advising him through the entire fiasco.

Rep. Carr’s booze bill comes to the House floor for a vote yet again next Wednesday.

Also read:

Rep. Joe Carr’s (R-48) Moonshine Bill heads to the House floor next week

Friday, May 8th, 2009

ketroncarrtoon

With the Senate’s passage of the Moonshine Bill, the focus now shifts to Rep. Joe Carr’s version in the House and the liquor interests Carr said his bill was for.

Two attorneys for IASIS Healthcare in Franklin, TN have asked Republican Sen. Bill Ketron (R-13) and Rep. Joe Carr (R-48) to push legislation to allow liquor manufactures across the state of Tennessee.

IASIS Healthcare Secretary and General Counsel Frank Coyle and IASIS Healthcare Operations Counsel Heath Clark were vaguely identified in an April 30, 2009 article in the Daily News Journal as “entreprenuers” who Sen. Ketron said sought his legislative help to bring distilleries to Tennessee, promising him one would locate in Rutherford County.

Both Clark and Coyle are not registered as lobbyists with the state of Tennessee.

Clark used to work for Bass, Berry & Simms, a legal and lobbying firm that represents the liquor industry, including Kentucky-based distilled spirits manufacturer Brown-Forman. If that name sounds familiar, it should. Sen. Ketron failed to get a bill passed for Brown-Forman back in 2006 that would have allowed a $10 million liquor museum in downtown Nashville. Interestingly enough, the current legislation sponsored by Sen. Ketron and Rep. Carr could allow Brown-Forman to pursue those plans without ever establishing its own distillery in Rutherford County or elsewhere.

As written, Sen. Ketron’s bill would allow a licensed distillery to operate a still of any size within zoning guidelines. That would include a very small “craft” still. Brown-Forman could easily have their $10 million museum in association with a small “craft” distillery through Sen. Ketron’s new bill without all the fuss of paying lobbyists and drawing attention to a previous failed effort.

On April 23 we reported that Rep. Joe Carr announced his intention to help the two IASIS attorneys bring a liquor distillery to Rutherford County. When asked who these people were by his colleagues, Rep. Carr had no idea but assured the House they were not contributors to his campaign. You can watch the embarrassing exchange in this video.

The reason Rep. Carr had no idea who his bill was for is now clear thanks to an article in Daily News Journal. Rep. Carr’s bill wasn’t by request of any voter in his district. It was requested by Sen. Ketron who asked Rep. Carr to sponsor a House version, and Rep. Carr did it without asking important questions or doing his homework.

The voters of Rutherford County deserve to know more about who is really behind Sen. Ketron and Rep. Carr’s effort to bring a liquor manufacturer to Rutherford County. What does IASIS think about their moonlighting attorney’s seeking this legislation?

Rutherford County deserves to know where they plan to put a liquor distillery, and we deserve due diligence before our lawmakers do the bidding of the liquor industry. Instead, Sen. Ketron and Rep. Carr are playing games and hiding the true interests behind their legislation.

Sen. Bill Ketron (R-13) blames media for focusing on his plan to gut ethics commission

Thursday, May 7th, 2009

ketronshockSen. Bill Ketron (R-13) is mad at all the attention he’s getting for trying to gut the ethics commission in the Tennessee Legislature and used up space in today’s Daily News Journal to defend himself.

Sen. Ketron continues to work hard on a plan to gut the very body that investigates corruption on Capitol Hill. It’s a curious move that would ultimately weaken the state legislature’s effort to hold elected officials accountable to the rule of law and the people they represent.

Sen. Ketron says it is important to gut the ethics commission because 98% of his colleagues are good, honest people. Rutherford County knows better than that, and so does Sam Stockard.

It seems more than anything that Ketron and Ramsey want to eliminate employees, including the director, and cut spending by about $330,000. There’s nothing wrong with cutting personnel costs if people are sitting around doing nothing. Otherwise, what is the rationale?

Ketron was quoted in the initial story on this issue as saying the Ethics Commission should focus less on enforcement. He also said 98 percent of legislators are honest folks and he simply wants to “streamline” government.

It’s comforting to know that Ketron can look into the minds and souls of our state’s lawmakers and determine they are honest people. Maybe that’s why he serves on the Senate Ethics Committee. However, cutting people probably means less enforcement, and most Tennesseans agree our lawmakers and lobbyists can’t always be trusted.

Under his proposal, Ketron said the Commission of Ethics and Election Finance would have one director and two deputy directors. Overall, though, three of the Ethics Commission’s nine people would be cut.

More delays for Rep. Joe Carr’s (R-48) moonshine bill

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

ketroncarr1

It’s been a bad stretch of road for Rep. Joe Carr’s (R-48) bill to bring more whiskey, vodka and other distilled spirits flowing into Tennessee.

Rep. Carr introduced his House version of the bill on April 23. When asked who the bill was written for by his House colleagues, Rep. Carr had no idea, and the embarrassing exchange is all over YouTube. The questions got so tough that Rep. Carr rolled the bill to the next calendar. Rep. Carr also made a startling admission on the floor of the House on what his bill will do for the state of Tennessee.

FINCHER: OK, so they’re is going to be more liquor and more whiskey and more vodka running around out here in our state because of this bill, correct?

CARR: I wouldn’t assume so, I would assume that would, uh, you could assume that. Yes sir.

Did you read that? Rep. Carr said you could safely assume his bill will bring “more liquor and more whiskey and more vodka running around out here in our state.” The Rutherford County Democratic Party commends Rep. Carr for his moment of honesty.

It would have also been easy for Rep. Carr to say his moonshine bill was written for the voters of Lascassas, but Rep. Carr knew that would have been a lie, and he told the truth. The Daily News Journal recently reported who the bill was really for.

Meanwhile, state Rep. Joe Carr, R-Lascassas, will ask the House of Representatives to approve the legislation today. Carr said he agreed to sponsor the house version of the bill at the request of Ketron.

Now we know why Rep. Carr was so clueless about a bill he sponsored but knew nothing about. On his second attempt recently, Rep. Carr again rolled the bill for another two weeks.

It’s a shame the people of Lascassas don’t have a Representative who will support whatever they ask for without question. Instead, Rep. Carr is busy working for Sen. Ketron and the liquor industry that funds his campaign while Rep. Carr actively seeks a reduction in unemployment benefits for the growing number of unemployed voters in his district.

The people of Lasscasas deserve a Representative that stands up for them.