Archive for the ‘Budget’ Category

Ronnie Barrett’s Free Road Will Cost State $762 Million

Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010

Doug Jackson and Donna Rowland with their little buddy Ronnie Barrett, who won't be getting a taxpayer-funded free road this year.

Doug Jackson and Donna Rowland with their little buddy Ronnie Barrett, who won't be getting a taxpayer-funded free road this year.

That’s right folks, Ronnie Barrett, Donna Rowland, and all their friends have jumped on board a sneaky plan in the waning hours of the legislative session that will cost the state $762 million in Federal Highway Administration funding. An amendment was approved last night in House Budget Subcommittee to give Ronnie his road, whether or not the Federal Highway Administration approves. The amendment has no sponsor, it isn’t posted online with all the others, and no one will talk about it although the bill is HB3796 sponsored by Rep. Mike Turner (D-Ol Hickory) with amendment drafting code 0192003 section 28.

Maybe no one will talk because TDOT has been issued a letter by the Federal Highway Administration threatening to pull $762 million dollars in funding to Tennessee if the federal right of way is given to Barrett in violation of federal statutes. Michelle Willard of the Murfreesboro Post and Jeff Woods of the Nashville Scene have the scoop:


Should the House Budget Subcommittee finish other outstanding business today, the House Finance Committee could vote on the amendment as early as Wednesday night.

Earlier this legislative session, the Senate Finance Committee voted to advance a similar bill that would grant Barrett the right-of-way needed to widen and extend Miller Lane to his factory expansion.

A companion bill in the state House has stalled after the Federal Highway Administration warned the state may lose highway funding of more than $762 million if the transfer of property is approved.

TDOT Spokeswoman Julie Oaks said the department asked the FHA earlier this year if the legislation would violate any federal transportation rules.

“They said, ‘this legislation seems to be in conflict with the core concepts of our program’,” Oaks read from a letter to TDOT Commissioner Gerald Nicely.

Woods:

As the session drags on endlessly and reporters nod off at their desks, Barrett’s many friends in the legislature have slipped into action. They’ve hidden an amendment in the latest House omnibus budget bill. They’re sneaky like that. Their amendment orders the Transportation Department to build Barrett’s road for him, and damn the consequences.

What are the consequences? How about the loss of millions of dollars in federal highway funds? That money is at risk because Barrett’s special amendment would force the state to relinquish federal right-of-way along Interstate 24. The feds frown on that.

“This could definitely cost us some money. That sounds like the Washington way of doing business,” said department spokeswoman Julie Oaks, taking a poke at one of the legislature’s more prominent supporters of the NRA.

At this moment, Pith is looking at a letter from the Federal Highway Administration to Transportation Commissioner Gerald Nicely, which says:

If the Department moves forward with the relinquishment of the Interstate right-of … the State of Tennessee could potentially become ineligible to receive a portion of the Federal funding available to it under the Federal-aid Highway Program. Tennessee’s share of the FAHP totaled $762,023,000 for federal fiscal year 2009.
That’s $762 million. But hey, what’s a little money between friends?

Columnist Gail Kerr Blasts GOP For Killing Infant Program

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

Gail Kerr, Columnist For The Tennessean

Gail Kerr, Columnist For The Tennessean

For all their talk about protecting life, the Tennessee GOP produced a budget that defunds a program to combat Tennessee’s abysmal infant mortality rate, saving infants from death in their first year. Gail Kerr went biblical in Sunday’s Tennessean:

Tennessee lawmakers who fight for laws to “choose life” now want to cut funding that helps keep the babies alive once they are born.

Have they no shame? No moral compass whatsoever? Tennessee ranked an abysmal 47th in the nation for the number of babies who die before their first birthday in 2003, and Gov. Phil Bredesen dedicated $4.6 million — matched dollar for dollar by federal money — to stop that.

Guess what Senate Republicans stripped from the state budget late last week? Yep. The folks who fight abortion as immoral and anti-Christian don’t seem to care too much what happens once a mother gives birth. Can you imagine how they’ll explain that on Judgment Day?

“Well, Lord. It was like this. We believe life begins at conception, and we’re against ending those lives. Once the babies are born? You’re on your own, kiddo. It’s a tough world. And we don’t tolerate slackers.”

It’s heartbreaking hypocrisy.

“If you are going to have a baby, let’s give that baby a fighting chance,” said Bob Duncan, head of the Governor’s Office of Children’s Care Coordination, which is on the chopping block. “This is real stuff. This is lives that are being saved and babies getting a chance to live. It just breaks my heart to know what is going to
happen.” If the Senate’s budget passes, this office will close.

What is going to happen? Newborns are going to die. It’s that simple. Politicians cannot hide the chilling statistics: In 2006, nine out of every 1,000 babies born in Nashville died before their first birthday. Today, thanks to this program that rate is down to six out of 1,000 births.

“There are three babies alive today that wouldn’t have been in 2006,” Duncan said.

Preventing Answers

It’s progress. But it’s not enough. The money state senators cut is used to methodically study infant mortality across the state. Area by area, why are babies dying?

“We basically can do a community review of every infant death, the community issues, the family issues, all the systems that could have intervened,” said Dr. Bill Paul, head of the Metro Health Department.

Using an evidence-based practice — meaning it has been proved to work — the state funds programs at nonprofits, hospitals and health departments that treat pregnant mothers so babies are born on time, not prematurely, and at a healthy weight. And they continue monitoring and offering services after the baby is born. Specific examples include prenatal vitamins, nutrition counseling, help quitting smoking, regular physician visits and distribution of safe bassinets.

How can any reasonable person turn that into a political football? It’s one thing to get into a fistfight in the waning days of the legislative session over projects like a fish hatchery and museums.

But this? If the house doesn’t put the money back, Senate Republicans will have balanced the state budget on the fragile backs of newborns, who cannot vote. And Tennessee babies will keep dying.

Pro-life? Really?

Coleman Fights GOP Plan To Kill MTSU Science Building

Friday, May 28th, 2010

Rep. Kent Coleman (D-Murfreesboro)

Rep. Kent Coleman (D-Murfreesboro)

Representative calls for investment in education, research

Just like last year, Tennessee Republicans including Sen. Bill Ketron, Sen. Jim Tracy, and Rep. Joe Carr produced a budget that would kill the MTSU science building project that has been in the works for nearly a decade, but Kent Coleman says federal money is there to get it done if they only had the will to stand up for MTSU. From a press release:

MURFREESBORO (MAY 28) – State Rep. Kent Coleman of Murfreesboro believes the use of one-time federal money to fund the Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU) Science Building is a unique opportunity for the number one capital improvement on the Tennessee Higher Education Commission’s (THEC) list of capital needs.

Coleman stated, “As part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, a change in the Federal Medicaid Match Rate (called FMAP) will result in one-time resources to the State of Tennessee, which cannot be deposited or credited to any reserve or rainy day fund in this state.” The adjustment in the FMAP results in approximately 340 million dollars which must be spent, in order to receive the benefits of this match.

The current budget proposals being communicated in the legislature have publicized the use of $16 million dollars of FMAP money for a fish hatchery to be located in Republican Speaker Kent Williams’ district. A special allocation to community colleges of $100 million dollars is to be spread throughout the state for capital improvements of the community college facilities. A West Tennessee Industrial Park is scheduled to receive $31.9 million dollars for the installation of infrastructure, and The University of Tennessee is to receive an additional $4 million dollars to demolish an existing building. The Tennessee Highway Patrol is to receive $90 million dollars to update its communication system.

Coleman further stated, “While all of these proposed capital expenditures may benefit Tennessee, we must set priorities and make the necessary investment in education, research and science.” “Some of the expenditures being considered don’t need to be funded in a lump sum,” Coleman said.

“We have more pressing concerns this year and fewer dollars to spend as a result of the recent downswing in the economy,” Coleman said. “As lawmakers and stewards of taxpayer dollars, it would make more sense to me for us to make more investments in education and research.”

MTSU has become the “University of Choice” for the largest number of undergraduate students in Tennessee and the academic quality of MTSU has improved throughout this enormous growth. MTSU, its students, and alumni should be recognized and supported for their role in higher education. When the FMAP money becomes available the science building deserves bi-partisan support of Republicans and Democrats. This needed improvement is a large capital project which has been on THEC’s capital list for at least nine years.

The Science Building would allow MTSU to attract and train students wishing to have careers in teaching, researching and otherwise working in the field of science. This resource would train students for future graduate studies in science, medicine, bioengineering and many other fields of future need. We simply cannot afford to neglect our institution of higher learning at a time when our economic recovery depends on long-term investments in education. FMAP money must be spent and MTSU’s Science Building should be on the top of the list to receive these funds.

“As a member of the General Assembly representing Rutherford County, I am concerned that Middle Tennessee has received the short end of the stick in this year’s budgeting process, and I call on member of the MTSU community to communicate their desires to legislators ” Coleman added.

Lee Campbell Gives Them The Bare Facts…

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

Our Vice Chairman lets everyone know the history behind Civil Rights and balanced budgets in today’s Daily News Journal:

Conservatives decry deficit spending, but JFK was one of four presidents since World War II to have achieved a balanced budget, so that eliminates the budget deficit as a reason for leaving the party. By the way, three of the four presidents who had balanced budgets were Democrats (Truman, JFK, and Clinton). The lone Republican budget balancer was Eisenhower. (Hey conservatives, what happened to Reagan and the two Bushes?)

Kent Coleman Answers the Hard Education Questions

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

h49_sidebar-1ANSWERS EMPHATICALLY THAT TENNESSEE DEMOCRATS’ PRIORITY IS EDUCATION AND WHAT WE STAND FOR

Rep. Kent Coleman (D-Murfreesboro) answered hard questions put to him by the Daily News Journal in Sunday’s edition. While other lawmakers are tiptoeing around education issues being handled in an upcoming Special Session of the General Assembly, Coleman clearly and precisely expressed his opinions on the matter of federal Race To The Top funding and teacher tenure, even when they differed from those of our Democratic governor. He also did the best job in recent memory of calling out Republicans for voting against education funding and then claiming the credit when Democrats got it done, and stating precisely why the Democratic Party of Tennessee is the only party in the state that has proper education of our children as its top priority:

Coleman: I do believe the Democratic Party has the strongest commitment to public education between the two parties. And I’ll give you an example. A few years ago, Gov. Bredesen put forth a proposal to raise about $250 million for school systems through a tobacco tax, and it raised (about) $20 million recurring money for Rutherford County and (Murfreesboro) city school systems. I was the only person in that commission meeting last week that voted to raise that money. But I sat there and listened to the members of the opposing party. I know one of them said something to the effect of a BEP reduction would be the last thing they would vote to do to our county, and I’m having to sit there and think, ‘You didn’t vote to raise the $20 million for Rutherford County,’ and all these commissioners, I don’t any of them realized that. So, someone’s got to communicate to the public education system that the Democratic Party has always had a strong conviction to the belief of equal education, public education, desegregation, and a lot of those of those issues haven’t been popular in the past, but they remain the strongest basis or the reason the Democratic Party exists in Tennessee, because education is our main expenditure at the state level.

Guns In Bars Shot Down, Ruled Unconstitutional

Saturday, November 21st, 2009

guns-booze-296x300Republicans controlled this year’s session of the Tennessee legislature for the first time since reconstruction (1870’s). They took over in a time of unprecedented economic hardship and sagging revenues, adding up to a budget mess that required quick action. What did republicans do with their newfound leadership opportunities? They plugged the budget holes with the very stimulus money they protested, passed “Guns in Bars”, and headed home with their pockets full of per diem checks.

All the while, far right Tennessee Republicans made impassioned speeches about “following the Constitution”, the evils of the stimulus package (yet spent it to plug budget holes), and “limited government”. They even formed a committee to study secession.

Now a Chancery Judge has ruled that the “Guns in Bars” law is unconstitutionally vague, citing that it is problematic for police and small business owners (you know, the ones republicans claim to protect). Following the Constitution to the letter is the one thing all republicans pride themselves in and espouse constantly. This year, when they finally took power for the first time since reconstruction, they couldn’t even do that. The City Paper has the story

In her ruling, [Chancellor] Bonnyman agreed the law was too vague and “does violate the due process rights of the public in general and plaintiff gun permit holders.” The chancellor based her decision on the fact that permit holders cannot determine whether or not they are in violation of the law.

“The principle business being conducted cannot be known to the ordinary citizen,” Bonnyman said. “Inquiry would not be satisfactory or helpful.”

It’s not clear whether or not the Attorney General will appeal the ruling, which effectively eliminated the statute from the law. The legislature is likely to address a new version of the bill in the next session but it is unclear whether or not a guns-in-bar provision will see the same support.

Metro Police Chief Ronal Serpas spoke out in support of Bonnyman’s decision, and said his one concern he had was that the ruling would allow the issue to “again take center stage during the next legislative session instead of the vitally important issue of keeping convicted felons behind bars.”

Tax & Spend Republicans: Comptroller Hides Cash Payments

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

During a time of unprecedented budget constraints, mass state employee layoffs and furloughs, and penny pinching on the part of Democratic Governor Phil Bredesen, our new Republican State Comptroller Justin Wilson has decided to give his office a personal stimulus check on the Tennessee taxpayers’ dime.

Luckily, Democrat Joe Haynes, who sits on the Fiscal Review Committee, caught the error and is calling Wilson out. WSMV has the story.

Veterans’ Health Care Is Bart Gordon’s First Budget Priority

Friday, October 9th, 2009

bartgordonWASHINGTON – For more than two decades, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs’ health care system has been plagued by consistently late and, at times, inadequate budgets. On Wednesday (October 7), the U.S. House of Representatives passed bipartisan legislation to ensure timely funding for veterans’ health care.

“Our veterans deserve the best available care – red tape and bureaucratic budgetary issues shouldn’t get in the way of their health care,” said Congressman Bart Gordon, who strongly supported the bill’s passage. “Over the years, the VA has had to make do with insufficient budgets resulting in restricted access for many veterans. This bill will change that.”

In 19 of the past 22 years, the VA has not received its budgetary funding prior to the start of the fiscal year. The legislation, the Veterans Health Care Budget Reform and Transparency Act (H.R. 1016), would require the VA to provide detailed budgetary estimates sooner so that Congress can allocate funds for the VA’s medical care programs one year in advance of the start of each fiscal year.

“My father and uncle served during World War II and they taught me the importance of taking care of those who volunteer to defend our country,” added Gordon. “Delays in VA funding do a disservice to those who have served. By streamlining the budgetary process, the VA will have up to a year to plan how to deliver the most efficient and effective care to our veterans.”

The bill would require the VA to submit a report each July on the resources it needs for the upcoming fiscal year in order for Congress to address any funding imbalances. This will help to safeguard against the budget shortfalls that the VA has faced in recent years.

The bipartisan bill is supported by a coalition of veteran service organizations, including the American Legion, Veterans of Foreign Wars, AMVETS, and Disabled American Veterans, who have endorsed the bill as “an historic legislative victory on behalf of all veterans.”

The bill now moves to the Senate where it is expected to pass and then be signed into law by the President.

Rep. Joe Carr (R-Lascassas) refuses to return thousands in bogus hotel and meal expenses

Friday, August 21st, 2009

Rep. Joe Carr (R-Lascassas) told Channel 4 today that he is refusing a request by voters to return thousands of dollars he recently told the Tennessean he “inadvertently” took from the tax payers and now claims he’s “entitled” to it.

Rep. Carr also told Channel 4 he took over $18,000 (more than any other lawmaker) in expenses to pay for hotel rooms, but no one seems to understand why he’d need that much money when he lives less than an hour from the state Capitol.

joebustedIn the video above, Rep. Carr couldn’t explain how he “inadvertently” drove himself to the bank to “inadvertently” cash 13 weeks worth of bogus meal and hotel expense checks.

Joe had the nerve to challenge his fellow big spending county Republicans to join him in not accepting anymore expense claims for the entire calendar year after we caught him with his hand in the tax payer’s pocket.

At the same time Rep. Carr was writing his own personal stimulus checks he’s now refusing to return, he had the nerve to try to pass a bill to deny extended unemployment benefits to residents in his district.

It’s time the voters of Lascassas introduce Joe Carr to the unemployment line come 2010.

Tax and Spend Republicans: Rep. Joe Carr “inadvertently” made bogus expense requests

Monday, August 17th, 2009
Rep Joe Carr: 'I didn't know I took all that money.'

Rep Joe Carr: I didn't know I took all that money.

Rep. Carr must think Rutherford County voters are stupid enough to believe he inadvertently requested expense money, inadvertently signed for the check and inadvertently drove himself to the bank to cash them.

This weekend’s Tennessean focused more on Rep. Joe Carr (R-48) out spending every single lawmaker in the House when it came to requesting $171 per day for hotel and meal expenses.

Rep. Carr had the nerve to tell the newspaper that he “inadvertently” requested more money for hotel and meal expenses than lawmakers who live in Memphis and Knoxville. Rep. Carr lives only 30 miles from the Capitol, and no one seems to know how he could have run up so many expenses.

“Among area lawmakers, Carr, a first-term lawmaker, claimed the most in per diem expenses in the first quarter of 2009, filing for $9,234 in charges. Carr said he inadvertently ran up the per diems while preparing for his first session in the state legislature.

“Because the state finances were in such a mess, after the election and before the session, I took several trips to Nashville,” Carr said. “I didn’t realize that every time I came to the legislature, they did a per diem.”

Carr said he did not become aware of the extent of the charges until media attention was called to it in the wake of Williams’ letter. He pledged to claim fewer days in the future.

During the last legislative session, Rep. Carr tried to deny extended unemployment benefits to residents in his district, but then he made bogus expense requests for hotels and meals he never purchased and got his own unemployment stimulus check compliments of Tennessee tax payers.

Now that the media caught him with his hand in the tax payer’s wallet, Rep. Joe Carr has promised to claim fewer bogus expense requests in the future. That must make the voters of Lascassas feel much better.

Tax and Spend Republicans: Rep. Joe Carr On The Dole

Tuesday, August 11th, 2009
Rep. Joe Carr takes over $18,000 for bogus hotel expenses when he lives 30 miles from the state Capitol!

Rep. Joe Carr takes over $18,000 for bogus hotel expenses when he lives 30 miles from the state Capitol!

QUESTION: Who is the member of the Tennessee House of Representatives who has taken more per diems than any other legislator on Capitol Hill?

ANSWER: It’s none other than Rutherford County’s Republican freshman Rep. Joe Carr (R-48). Here’s part of the Tennessee Democratic Party press release last week:

“Mr. Carr seems to be talking out of both sides of his mouth on this issue,” Forrester said. “Back home he rants about taxes, but he sure comes to Nashville often to collect his per diem, which reimburses lawmakers for their expenses while doing official business.

“Speaker Kent Williams even sent a letter recently to House members encouraging them to limit use of expense money they collect from the state.”

It must be embarrassing for Rep. Carr to know voters pay attention to these things. For months, Rep. Carr ignored his own party’s leadership warning him and other free -loaders to stop using per diems as his personal unemployment check, but that’s exactly what he’s done.

What’s worse is Rep. Carr doesn’t feel he owes anyone an explanation.

Like many of his constituents, Rep. Carr has fallen on hard times in this 1 1/2 year long Bush recession. But instead of trying to help his district recover from the results of 8 years of failed conservative economic policy, Rep. Carr drafted legislation demanding Gov. Bredesen deny extended jobless benefits to the growing unemployed in Lascassas when they needed it the most. Rep. Carr told listeners on 1450 WGNS that extending their unemployment benefits “would cost too much of the tax payer’s money.”

Now we find out that Rep. Carr, who has no job himself, has been taking his own personal stimulus check directly from tax payers through bogus $171 a day per diem requests meant to pay for hotel and meals for out of town legislators. Rep. Joe Carr claimed more than $18,000 for hotels and meals, even though he lives 30 miles from Nashville. More than $7,000 of that was since July when nothing is going on at the Capitol!

Don’t take our word for it. You can view the public record posted for everyone to see right on the state legislature’s website.

Lascassas deserves an honest, hard working Representative who doesn’t spend as much tax money as Memphis legislators who actually need hotel rooms. The voters ought to ask Rep. Carr what on earth he did with their money.

Tax and Spend Republicans: Rowland, Carr, Ketron and Tracy top the list

Thursday, August 6th, 2009

whattheycost2

The state legislature may be out of session but according to local media reports Rep. Joe Carr (R-48) has been spending a lot of summer days at the Capitol claiming per diems, a day’s pay for showing up. Rep. Carr was at the top of the list when it came to which Republican requested the most per diems after the session was already over.

It’s gotten so bad that Republican House Speaker Kent Williams issued a letter to all Representatives asking them to follow some basic guidelines to cut per diem requests. You can read the letter here.

Rep. Carr must not have gotten the memo because he kept requesting money all summer when he thought no one would be watching. Rep. Carr didn’t think twice about pushing his own bill in the last session demanding Gov. Bredesen not accept federal stimulus funds for extended jobless benefits for his district’s growing unemployed. Now that Rep. Carr needs a stimulus of his own, he’s off to collect his directly from the tax payers.

We’ll take a closer look at Rep. Carr’s summer per diem requests later, but first, let’s look at how much our county’s delegation is costing us.

What the list of our county delegation’s per diem requests for the entire session factually shows the voters of our county is a record of spending on the part of the Republican delegation. Rep. Donna Rowland (R-34) doesn’t look that bad on the surface, but then she’s got a lot of making up to do for being deemed the most expensive Republican in the entire House for filing resolutions honoring everything from campaign contributors to her new boyfriend.

The list below does not include per diem requests made after the session, which ought to put Rep. Carr over the top.

Member

(R) Sen. Jim Tracy from Shelbyville

Mileage

$ 2,039.04

Per Diem

$ 18,126.00

Total

$ 20,165.04

(R) Rep. Joe Carr from Lascassas $ 1,425.60 $ 16,929.00 $ 18,354.60
(R) Sen. Bill Ketron from Murfreesboro $ 1,306.42 $ 15,048.00 $ 16,354.42
(R) Rep. Donna Rowland from Murfreesboro $ 831.60 $ 12,825.00 $ 13,656.60
(D) Rep. Kent Coleman from Murfreesboro $ 756.00 $ 12,825.00 $ 13,581.00

Update From Congressman Bart Gordon

Friday, July 31st, 2009

bartgordonReducing the Deficit

Friends,

Last week, the U.S. House passed the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act (”PAYGO”). I was an original cosponsor of PAYGO because I believe it can bring our budget back to sound footing and help our economy grow.

In case you missed it, Monday’s print-edition of The Tennessean included a column I wrote about the importance of the PAYGO rule. To read the article, click here.

Know that I am committed to reducing the budget deficit and ensuring that any new federal spending is completely offset.

Stay in touch,

Bart Gordon
Member of Congress

Tennessee Republicans vote against fiscal responsibility

Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

Throughout the 1990s the success of pay-go rules in the United States Congress helped reign in deficit spending that flourished under President George H. Bush. Pay-go rules put in place under Democrats turned those deficits into record surpluses under President Bill Clinton.

Pay-go rules were later abandoned by Republicans under President George W. Bush and the resulting borrowing and deficit spending produced the nation’s largest deficit in United States history, plunging the nation into a deep, long-lasting recession.

Pay-go rules require any new spending by the United States Congress to be paid for by a reduction in spending or tax increases. Under pay-go rules, the Republican policy of borrowing and deficit spending give way to the kind of fiscal responsibility working families are used to. If you don’t have the money in the bank, you don’t spend it or go looking for the credit card.

Yesterday, Democrats, including Rep. Bart Gordon, put these pay-go rules back into effect, but not a single Republican from our state voted for it. The person who has now come to represent opposition to this proven fiscally policy is none other than Tennessee Republican Rep. Marsha Blackburn.

Watch this video and listen as Rep. Blackburn makes the Republican case for saving more money by letting Americans die in future national emergencies like “Katrina” and “tsunamis.” Rep. Blackburn’s proposal was met with such national outrage that her spokesperson had to issue a pathetic apology that said Rep. Blackburn’s mouth gets ahead of her brain sometimes.

We totally agree, but an apology for her vote against fiscal responsible pay-go rules would have sufficed.

Gordon: “Federal Spending Patterns Can’t Continue”

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009

bartgordonWASHINGTON – This week the U.S. House will take an important step towards reducing federal spending by passing H.R. 2920, the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act (“PAYGO”). This legislation re-establishes the principle responsible for budget surpluses at the end of the 1990s, which required that any new spending by Congress be offset with a reduction in existing spending.

“Our federal spending patterns can’t continue,” said Congressman Bart Gordon who is a long-time supporter of PAYGO. “We have been borrowing money from China, as well as other countries, since 2002 to pay for federal programs and initiatives. This bill draws a firm line in the sand – moving forward, if we are going to spend a dollar, we must find a U.S. dollar to pay for it.”

The first PAYGO rule was included in the Budget Enforcement Act, which was signed into law with Gordon’s strong support in 1990. Over the next decade, PAYGO resulted in a gradual reduction of the federal deficit, and in 1998, the federal government saw its first budget surplus since 1969. Unfortunately, despite Gordon’s objections, PAYGO was not reauthorized in 2002. Since then, the federal deficit has skyrocketed.

“As our economy continues to recover from the most severe economic downturn since the Great Depression, we must focus on creating jobs and making the U.S. dollar strong again. Reducing federal spending will help on both fronts,” added Gordon. “This legislation expresses our long-term commitment to balanced budgets and financial solvency.”federalbudget

The PAYGO legislation to be considered in the House this week will require all new spending policies passed by Congress be offset over five and ten years. It will force a serious examination of wasteful spending programs in the budget and tax loopholes that can be eliminated to offset more worthwhile programs.