Comments on: More delays for Rep. Joe Carr’s (R-48) moonshine bill http://www.rutherfordcountydemocrats.org/2009/05/more-delays-for-rep-joe-carrs-r-48-moonshine-bill/ Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:28:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: Donna http://www.rutherfordcountydemocrats.org/2009/05/more-delays-for-rep-joe-carrs-r-48-moonshine-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1478 Donna Fri, 08 May 2009 00:32:19 +0000 http://www.rutherfordcountydemocrats.org/?p=382#comment-1478 What more context do you need besides video? Go watch it. If that segment of that video were played in a cable television ad no one would have a problem understanding Joe himself explicitly agree that it is safe to assume this bill would lead to more liquor flowing through our county. Carr is a nice enough guy but he's not that bright and his moments of honesty are precious. Anyone asking Joe Carr to sponsor their bill can expect a lot more of these kind of embarrassing mistakes. What more context do you need besides video? Go watch it. If that segment of that video were played in a cable television ad no one would have a problem understanding Joe himself explicitly agree that it is safe to assume this bill would lead to more liquor flowing through our county. Carr is a nice enough guy but he’s not that bright and his moments of honesty are precious. Anyone asking Joe Carr to sponsor their bill can expect a lot more of these kind of embarrassing mistakes.

]]> By: Matthew Hurtt http://www.rutherfordcountydemocrats.org/2009/05/more-delays-for-rep-joe-carrs-r-48-moonshine-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1476 Matthew Hurtt Thu, 07 May 2009 23:24:59 +0000 http://www.rutherfordcountydemocrats.org/?p=382#comment-1476 Nice way to drop the context. What Carr actually said was that Rep. Hank Fincher could assume that if he wanted to, but that Carr himself would not personally make that assumption. Watch the video again. You suggest <blockquote>Did you read that? Rep. Carr said you could safely assume his bill will bring “more liquor and more whiskey and more vodka running around out here in our state.”</blockquote> That is not the case at all. I know you guys are excited about getting your little website up, but at least try to be honest. Nice way to drop the context. What Carr actually said was that Rep. Hank Fincher could assume that if he wanted to, but that Carr himself would not personally make that assumption. Watch the video again.

You suggest

Did you read that? Rep. Carr said you could safely assume his bill will bring “more liquor and more whiskey and more vodka running around out here in our state.”

That is not the case at all.

I know you guys are excited about getting your little website up, but at least try to be honest.

]]>